Trying To Change A Broken System. Why GAL (guardian ad litem) reform is needed now.

By Catherine Cooper | Feb 17, 2012

My friend is going through a divorce. It has been going on well over a year now. You would think that it taking this long means there are lots of assets to split; a house, cars, a huge income to divide, maybe a big retirement account? No, that isn't the case. It's the issue parents argue most about in a case of an acrimonious divorce, the custody of a child.

Because the parents could not agree on the time division or primary residence for their 7 year old boy, a guardian ad litem (GAL) was appointed to the case. She was supposed to mediate 'in the best interest of the child' and help the parents reach an agreed on division of the boys time. The case started with the mother and the son living in another state with the mother facing prison time for repeatedly driving under the influence and finally driving without a license.

The GAL, who is supposed to be a neutral party, decided to write a letter on social worker letterhead on the mother's behalf to try and keep her out of prison declaring that the son, who the GAL had never met, had the potential of becoming a 'Unabomber' with other possible terrorists being listed; now remember she had written this before ever having met the child.

Her being a GAL has kept her free from any real complaint process, there is no forum for complaints or lawsuits against a GAL (guardian ad litem) except filing a complaint with the presiding judge that appointed her, due to that, the judge must admit he or she was wrong in appointing her, therefore the complaint going forward is not likely to happen. That is one of the things that we are trying to change. Social workers and lawyers have to face sanctions and lawsuits when they are deficient or incompetent or biased as this GAL was, why shouldn't she and other GALs face major consequences for their incompetence?

The bill presented to my friend defies logic. Items that read 'wrote email' and 'made phone call' with no detail or explanation; how that  totals over $11,000 is not only unknown, it's obscene.The parents inability to pay should have been considered as in case, Desmond vs Desmond where the parents made more than my friend does now.

Another part of this that needs changing is that the judicial system is where the guardian ad litem profession is presently housed. This allows for an incestuous relationship between the lawyer who may be representing one of the parties in the case who recommends the GAL to the judge, who then appoints her to the case. Take the GAL position and move it to the executive branch, away from the 'love triangle' of judge, lawyer and GAL. If that for some reason, cannot happen, as 5 state audits have suggested should happen, then let's figure something out. To continually ignore audits and reviews that expose and outline problems with this broken system is criminal.

Let's fix it now! Visit our Facebook pages Megalalert for Maine issues and Nationalgalalert for national issues. Write us with your story on Facebook or megalalert@gmail.com and nationalgalalert@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

Comments (3)
Posted by: Catherine Cooper | Feb 06, 2012 09:55

A big thank you to the many people who have contacted us to share their very personal stories of divorce or relationship gone bad and unfortunately in some cases, a situation made worse with a GAL ( guardian ad litem) who instead of mediating and resolving conflict,  aggravated the situation. Please know we want to hear what you have to say and help spread the word for real change in the GAL profession. Contact us at megalalert@gmail.com or our Facebook pages Megalalert or Nationalgalalert nationalgalalert@gmail.com   



Posted by: Catherine Cooper | Feb 05, 2012 00:00

Another state, another ignored audit: Many concerns have been raised about the use of guardians ad litem. Most complaints have centered on guardian actions in family court cases, primarily in contested divorce actions. Complaints have focused on guardian bias, lack of oversight and accountability, inadequate training, and inappropriate communication between guardians and judges. Parents have also complained that there is no place to seek relief if they have a problem with a guardian.



Posted by: Catherine Cooper | Feb 04, 2012 22:56

Quotes from an ignored audit:

• Move the Office of the Guardian ad Litem to the executive branch,
and place it in an existing department.
• Move the Office of the Guardian ad Litem to the executive branch,
and make it an independent executive branch agency that reports to
an appointed oversight board.
• Move the Office of the Guardian ad Litem to the executive branch,
and make it part of the Attorney General’s Office.
• Leave the Office of the Guardian ad Litem in the judicial branch,
but have it report to a board appointed by the Judicial Council.
Oversight by this new board could at least partially resolve the
ethical conflict of having the Judicial Council supervise the GAL.
1. We recommend the Legislature review, as an interim study item, the
oversight structure of the Office of the Guardian ad Litem. This review
is necessary because ethical concerns prevent the Judicial Council
from providing adequate oversight.
2. Pending legislative action, we recommend the Judicial Council consider
ways to improve oversight of the Office of the Guardian ad Litem. One
such improvement could be for the Judicial Council to appoint a board
of non-judges to oversee the GAL.



If you wish to comment, please login.