Reuters -Obama's Backdoor taxes to hit middle class.
Backdoor taxes to hit middle class
By Terri Cullen
NEW YORK (Reuters.com) —The Obama administration's plan to cut more than $1 trillion from the deficit over the next decade relies heavily on so-called backdoor tax increases that will result in a bigger tax bill for middle-class families.
In the 2010 budget tabled by President Barack Obama on Monday, the White House wants to let billions of dollars in tax breaks expire by the end of the year — effectively a tax hike by stealth.
While the administration is focusing its proposal on eliminating tax breaks for individuals who earn $250,000 a year or more, middle-class families will face a slew of these backdoor increases.
The targeted tax provisions were enacted under the Bush administration's Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001. Among other things, the law lowered individual tax rates, slashed taxes on capital gains and dividends, and steadily scaled back the estate tax to zero in 2010.
If the provisions are allowed to expire on December 31, the top-tier personal income tax rate will rise to 39.6 percent from 35 percent. But lower-income families will pay more as well: the 25 percent tax bracket will revert back to 28 percent; the 28 percent bracket will increase to 31 percent; and the 33 percent bracket will increase to 36 percent. The special 10 percent bracket is eliminated.
Investors will pay more on their earnings next year as well, with the tax on dividends jumping to 39.6 percent from 15 percent and the capital-gains tax increasing to 20 percent from 15 percent. The estate tax is eliminated this year, but it will return in 2011 — though there has been talk about reinstating the death tax sooner.
Millions of middle-class households already may be facing higher taxes in 2010 because Congress has failed to extend tax breaks that expired on January 1, most notably a "patch" that limited the impact of the alternative minimum tax. The AMT, initially designed to prevent the very rich from avoiding income taxes, was never indexed for inflation. Now the tax is affecting millions of middle-income households, but lawmakers have been reluctant to repeal it because it has become a key source of revenue.
Without annual legislation to renew the patch this year, the AMT could affect an estimated 25 million taxpayers with incomes as low as $33,750 (or $45,000 for joint filers). Even if the patch is extended to last year's levels, the tax will hit American families that can hardly be considered wealthy — the AMT exemption for 2009 was $46,700 for singles and $70,950 for married couples filing jointly.
Middle-class families also will find fewer tax breaks available to them in 2010 if other popular tax provisions are allowed to expire. Among them:
* Taxpayers who itemize will lose the option to deduct state sales-tax payments instead of state and local income taxes;
* The $250 teacher tax credit for classroom supplies;
* The tax deduction for up to $4,000 of college tuition and expenses;
* Individuals who don't itemize will no longer be able to increase their standard deduction by up to $1,000 for property taxes paid;
* The first $2,400 of unemployment benefits are taxable, in 2009 that amount was tax-free.






























Story To Tell
Back on Tuesday, Reuters' reporter Terri Cullen published a story entitled "Backdoor taxes to hit middle class," which alleged a series of stealth middle classes tax increases proposed by the Obama White House.
The White House complained that the story contained numerous false claims. Reuters pulled the story after conceding it contained "significant errors of fact" and said a new corrected story would be forthcoming. Then they apparently concluded that the errors were so thoroughgoing that no corrected story would be published.
Now comes word from former Editor & Publisher editor Greg Mitchell that Cullen is now no longer working at Reuters, though the circumstances of her departure remain unclear.
--Josh Marshall
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/
Obama’s Not So Secret Plan to Raise Taxes
By Peter Roff, Thomas Jefferson Street blog
In his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama bragged that his administration had not raised taxes, contrary to what its opponents had alleged. "We cut taxes for 95 percent of working families. We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college," he said, adding, "And we haven't raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime."
Leaving aside the need for fact-checking--the validity of the president's assertion hinges on just what constitutes a cut in taxes--the president's $3.8 trillion budget for the upcoming fiscal year turns that statement on its head, even by the White House's own estimates. Released to the public Monday, the Obama budget as proposed increases taxes by more than $2 trillion over 10 years, without taking into account the potential impact on revenues if the cap and trade energy tax ever passes. With "cap and tax"--as its opponents call it--the tax burden in the budget would be even higher.
Moreover the Obama budget relies heavily on what some are already calling "backdoor tax increases" to pare down the record levels of debt and deficits ($1.6 trillion for Fiscal Year 2010 alone) the administration has run up in just one year in office. Obama's budget calls for an increases in taxes of $2.8 trillion over 10 years. This includes allowing many of the so-called Bush tax cuts to expire at the end of the current year and allowing the top rate (which often applies to small businesses as well as households and individuals) to go from 35 percent back up to 39.6 percent. And the White House is proposing--or at least forecasting--higher taxes on dividends , capital gains and other activity tied to economic growth and investment.
For a year we've had the spending. Now we get taxes. What a difference a week makes.
I love that they are trying to say NOW...no no no we are going to leave the rate alone...but they promised a tax cut...so why would the rate stay at 25%? What a bunch of unethical liars at the WH.
That's the ticket, take more money out of the economy.
This reporter from Reuters will be in big trouble.
Darin, didn't you know that Obama was forced to lie to us as a result of the mess left by the Bush administration? It's not his fault.